UNITECH WIRELESS
22 licences
Group companies of Indian realty firm Unitech that were given 22 telecom licences had not fulfilled eligibility norms for getting these licences, the auditor said. The companies had suppressed facts, had less share capital than required, and submitted false certificates for paid-up capital among other deficiencies found, the auditor said.The telecom venture has since been bought into by Norway’s Telenor, which currently owns 67.3% of the venture with Unitech holding the remainder.
LOOP TELECOM
21 licences
Loop Telecom, which was issued 21 telecom licences, suppressed facts, its authorised share capital was much less than required, and it did not have telecom as the main object clause in its memorandum of association among other flaws, the auditor said.
VIDEOCON TELECOMM
21 licences
Videocon Telecommunications, formerly Datacom Solutions, is part of India’s Videocon group and was issued 21 licences. The auditor said the company had suppressed facts, had much less-than-required authorised share capital and submitted false certificates regarding the company’s paid-up capital.
ETISALAT DB TELECOM
15 licences
Formerly Swan Telecom, the company had been given 13 licences and also later merged with itself another firm that had won 2 licences. Abu Dhabi’s Etisalat in late 2008 bought about 45% of the company that was then renamed Etisalat DB Telecom. The auditor said Swan had suppressed facts, had less-than-required authorised share capital, and submitted false certificates from its company secretary regarding paid-up capital. The auditor also said a unit of India’s No. 2 telecom firm Reliance Communications held over 10% of equity in Swan at the time of issue of the licences, which is a violation of rules. The telecom minister said they would refer Swan’s case to the corporate affairs ministry to see if “front companies” were involved.
S TEL
6 licences
S Tel, which was given six licences, suppressed facts, had much less than the authorised share capital required to get the licences, submitted false certificate from its company secretary regarding paid up capital. Bahrain Telecommunications Co had bought a stake in S Tel, whose other major shareholder is India’s Siva Group.
22 licences
Group companies of Indian realty firm Unitech that were given 22 telecom licences had not fulfilled eligibility norms for getting these licences, the auditor said. The companies had suppressed facts, had less share capital than required, and submitted false certificates for paid-up capital among other deficiencies found, the auditor said.The telecom venture has since been bought into by Norway’s Telenor, which currently owns 67.3% of the venture with Unitech holding the remainder.
LOOP TELECOM
21 licences
Loop Telecom, which was issued 21 telecom licences, suppressed facts, its authorised share capital was much less than required, and it did not have telecom as the main object clause in its memorandum of association among other flaws, the auditor said.
VIDEOCON TELECOMM
21 licences
Videocon Telecommunications, formerly Datacom Solutions, is part of India’s Videocon group and was issued 21 licences. The auditor said the company had suppressed facts, had much less-than-required authorised share capital and submitted false certificates regarding the company’s paid-up capital.
ETISALAT DB TELECOM
15 licences
Formerly Swan Telecom, the company had been given 13 licences and also later merged with itself another firm that had won 2 licences. Abu Dhabi’s Etisalat in late 2008 bought about 45% of the company that was then renamed Etisalat DB Telecom. The auditor said Swan had suppressed facts, had less-than-required authorised share capital, and submitted false certificates from its company secretary regarding paid-up capital. The auditor also said a unit of India’s No. 2 telecom firm Reliance Communications held over 10% of equity in Swan at the time of issue of the licences, which is a violation of rules. The telecom minister said they would refer Swan’s case to the corporate affairs ministry to see if “front companies” were involved.
S TEL
6 licences
S Tel, which was given six licences, suppressed facts, had much less than the authorised share capital required to get the licences, submitted false certificate from its company secretary regarding paid up capital. Bahrain Telecommunications Co had bought a stake in S Tel, whose other major shareholder is India’s Siva Group.


